Microsoft: September 2026 review

Copilot models: GPT-6 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok

Assess new Microsoft Copilot models: GPT-6 Sol and Opus 5.5 rollout, regional Grok preview restrictions and practical model selection for businesses.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

Microsoft is adding GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 to Copilot. The rollout announced on 22 September 2026 covers several work surfaces but varies by licence, access and region. Grok is a separate Frontier preview unavailable in the EU, EFTA and UK. Businesses should compare actual tasks and account access rather than treating every announcement as immediately usable.

Match each announcement to its actual access conditions

Microsoft names Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Chat, Cowork and Copilot Studio in the rollout of GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5. This does not promise that every business account already has an identical model picker. Record the surface, licence and visible choices for each test. Availability inside Copilot is also separate from a direct OpenAI or Anthropic account. What matters is which tools and organisational sources work in that Microsoft experience. Before evaluating a model, perform a basic capability check: sign-in, the required source file, the intended output format and permitted actions should all work in the test account.

Why the Grok announcement has limited immediate relevance in Germany

The 12 September Grok announcement describes a Frontier rollout in Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Access to the additional provider is administratively off by default. The EU, EFTA and UK are explicitly excluded during this preview. For a German small business, this is therefore information to track, not an immediate deployment instruction. Availability of a model in another product also does not establish access in your own Microsoft tenant. If regional support changes, review provider terms, data handling and the administrative decision again. An additional model name alone is insufficient reason to enable processing that the business does not need.

Example: explaining a monthly performance report

A useful comparison starts with an already reconciled monthly report and three questions: which differences are supported, what information is missing and what should management ask next? Give available models the same sources and instructions. A business reviewer checks that figures are copied accurately and hypotheses remain identifiable. Then compare rework and turnaround. This is a suggested experiment, not a Werkverstand benchmark. A more verbose model is not automatically better. A short management briefing may benefit more from concise, precise explanation than a lengthy analysis introducing unnecessary side issues that the reviewer then has to remove.

Model choice does not replace useful business context

Microsoft combines model choice with organisational context through Work IQ. For implementation, ask whether the assistant finds the approved source or merely an old file with a similar name. Review storage, clear titles and permissions. If several documents contain different figures, specify the authoritative one in the request. Do not expect a newer model to hide an ambiguous information estate behind more persuasive wording. Include a case with insufficient evidence: the correct result is a useful clarification request. Reliable source selection improves the validity of every subsequent model comparison and helps distinguish retrieval problems from reasoning problems.

Review costs and controls for each surface

For Cowork, Microsoft documents selectable reasoning effort; greater effort can require more time and credits. Do not apply those rules indiscriminately to every Office surface or licence contract. Record usage alongside the result and inspect administrative model controls. A team standard might start routine document work with the available default and evaluate genuinely difficult cases separately. Document exceptions and name a responsible contact. When available models change, rerun a few known cases. This keeps quality and costs observable without rebuilding the entire workflow for each new name, while still allowing evidence-based improvements when a replacement performs better.

Common questions about Copilot model changes

Are GPT-6 Sol and Opus 5.5 immediately present everywhere? No, Microsoft describes a staged rollout with access conditions. Can German organisations plan to use Grok in this preview? Not according to the checked announcement. Should Microsoft and direct-provider accounts produce identical results? No; context, tools and settings differ. How should we choose? Use a realistic task, fixed sources and a known acceptable result. Which decision can wait? A universal model switch without an observed quality problem. Begin with a workflow that currently causes substantial measurable rework and compare the complete journey to business approval there.

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Find the right AI workflow with the System Check

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials