Practical guide

RAG with visible sources

The objective is to build internal answers with traceable references. The review baseline covers curated sources, permissions, chunking, retrieval tests and citation display.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

RAG with visible sources needs curated content and traceable access permissions before answers are generated. Check whether retrieval and text splitting deliver the relevant reference and whether it supports the specific claim. A displayed citation alone does not prove an answer is correct.

01 / FIT

A good fit when

  • Goal, scope and domain accountability are explicit.
  • The review baseline is available: curated sources, permissions, chunking, retrieval tests and citation display.
  • A test with known questions records retrieved passages, permissions and support for the answer. Cases without a suitable source or involving disallowed documents produce neither unsupported nor unauthorised answers.

02 / LIMITS

Not the first choice when

  • Avoid: treating visible citations as proof of correctness. A source display is insufficient if the reference does not support the claim or access to its underlying document is not permitted.
  • There is neither safe test data nor a manual fallback.
  • A product demo is expected to replace domain acceptance.

Bound the sources and research question

The work assignment is to build internal answers with traceable references. Define purpose, owner and permitted operating boundary before the first test.

The domain review baseline covers curated sources, permissions, chunking, retrieval tests and citation display. Assumptions and missing information remain visible in the result.

Match references to claims

  • Assemble a curated source set with ownership, freshness status and access permissions.
  • Select known questions with expected references and test text splitting and retrieval against them.
  • Compare each answer with its displayed reference and flag unsupported claims.
  • Explicitly test missing sources and excluded documents and define the update process.

Document uncertainty visibly

A test with known questions records retrieved passages, permissions and support for the answer. Cases without a suitable source or involving disallowed documents produce neither unsupported nor unauthorised answers.

Avoid: treating visible citations as proof of correctness. A source display is insufficient if the reference does not support the claim or access to its underlying document is not permitted.

Decision matrix

Decision pointProceed whenStop when
Source baselineDocumented: curated sources, permissions, chunking, retrieval tests and citation display.Scope, data or accountability remains unresolved.
Evidence reviewA test with known questions records retrieved passages, permissions and support for the answer. Cases without a suitable source or involving disallowed documents produce neither unsupported nor unauthorised answers.There is only an unevaluated demo without acceptance evidence.
Claim boundaryOwner, approval, fallback and next review date are defined.Avoid: treating visible citations as proof of correctness. A source display is insufficient if the reference does not support the claim or access to its underlying document is not permitted.

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Which AI system fits your business?

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials