Practical guide

MCP for GitHub, Slack, Notion and Drive

The objective is to operate several connectors with separate permissions and purposes. The review baseline covers a separate scope, data path, owner and audit evidence for each service.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

Operate connections to GitHub, Slack, Notion and Drive with a distinct purpose, scope and owner for each. A shared interface must not obscure the separate data paths. For every service, it should remain traceable which data can be read and which changes can be triggered.

01 / FIT

A good fit when

  • Goal, scope and domain accountability are explicit.
  • The review baseline is available: a separate scope, data path, owner and audit evidence for each service.
  • A connector inventory with separate permissions and owners is supplemented by one permitted and one denied access test per service. Audit evidence can be attributed to the relevant connector.

02 / LIMITS

Not the first choice when

  • Avoid: one super-connector with all enterprise permissions. An access bundle whose permissions or audit trails cannot be attributed to individual services prevents targeted approval and troubleshooting.
  • There is neither safe test data nor a manual fallback.
  • A product demo is expected to replace domain acceptance.

Bound interfaces and permissions

The work assignment is to operate several connectors with separate permissions and purposes. Define purpose, owner and permitted operating boundary before the first test.

The domain review baseline covers a separate scope, data path, owner and audit evidence for each service. Assumptions and missing information remain visible in the result.

Check the data flow step by step

  • Record purpose, data path, owner and required access for every service needed.
  • Bound scopes by service and distinguish read access from changes with external effects.
  • Test each connector separately with permitted and excluded content.
  • Document audit evidence and the way to disable each service and review them regularly.

Demonstrate effects and access control

A connector inventory with separate permissions and owners is supplemented by one permitted and one denied access test per service. Audit evidence can be attributed to the relevant connector.

Avoid: one super-connector with all enterprise permissions. An access bundle whose permissions or audit trails cannot be attributed to individual services prevents targeted approval and troubleshooting.

Decision matrix

Decision pointProceed whenStop when
Access and data pathDocumented: a separate scope, data path, owner and audit evidence for each service.Scope, data or accountability remains unresolved.
Connection under testA connector inventory with separate permissions and owners is supplemented by one permitted and one denied access test per service. Audit evidence can be attributed to the relevant connector.There is only an unevaluated demo without acceptance evidence.
External effectOwner, approval, fallback and next review date are defined.Avoid: one super-connector with all enterprise permissions. An access bundle whose permissions or audit trails cannot be attributed to individual services prevents targeted approval and troubleshooting.

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Which AI system fits your business?

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials