Practical guide

Install and secure Claude Code

The objective is to install Claude Code reproducibly and limit it to a repository. The review baseline covers runtime, sign-in, repository rules, sandbox, network and tests.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

Install Claude Code through an official route and validate it in a bounded test project. Include the operating system, sign-in, update route and safeguards actually available. The Bash sandbox is not available on every platform and does not replace permission rules for other tools.

01 / FIT

A good fit when

  • A concrete assignment and an accountable domain owner are defined.
  • A recorded test in an isolated repository shows the workspace, requested permissions, a small traceable change and its test result. The subsequent review explains the change.

02 / LIMITS

Not the first choice when

  • Avoid: broad permissions and production access before the first test. Successful sign-in or installation is insufficient for approving production access; permissions and effects need to be checked against the bounded test assignment.

Keep installation and updates traceable

Choose the official installation route for your operating system. Check the version with claude --version and use claude doctor for setup diagnostics. Updates depend on how the installation was performed: native installers and package managers follow different routes. Record the method instead of unknowingly maintaining multiple installations.

Assess the platform and protection boundary together

The official setup documents sandbox support for WSL 2 but not native Windows or WSL 1. The Bash sandbox constrains commands and their child processes; permission rules also cover other tools. If a pilot requires technical isolation, the chosen environment must actually provide it. An instruction in a prompt does not substitute for it.

Accept the first task through its diff

Start in a test repository without production credentials. Use a known issue with clear acceptance criteria. Review requested permissions, the diff and relevant tests together. If additional network destinations or tools become necessary, justify each access. This run establishes whether the setup fits the engineering workflow.

Decision matrix

Decision pointProceed whenStop when
Working environmentDocumented: runtime, sign-in, repository rules, sandbox, network and tests.Scope, data or accountability remains unresolved.
Isolated functional testA recorded test in an isolated repository shows the workspace, requested permissions, a small traceable change and its test result. The subsequent review explains the change.There is only an unevaluated demo without acceptance evidence.
Operational readinessOwner, approval, fallback and next review date are defined.Avoid: broad permissions and production access before the first test. Successful sign-in or installation is insufficient for approving production access; permissions and effects need to be checked against the bounded test assignment.

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Which AI system fits your business?

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials