Practical guide

Build good skills and prompts

The objective is to make instructions reproducible, testable and maintainable. The review baseline covers goal, context, boundaries, examples, output format and evaluation.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

Good prompts and skills connect goals, context and boundaries with examples and a verifiable output format. Start with acceptance: what must a usable result contain, and when should it show uncertainty? Test changes against the same tasks to keep instructions maintainable.

01 / FIT

A good fit when

  • Goal, scope and domain accountability are explicit.
  • The review baseline is available: goal, context, boundaries, examples, output format and evaluation.
  • A fixed test set shows that typical tasks produce the agreed output and edge cases keep missing information visible. Instruction changes have a documented review result.

02 / LIMITS

Not the first choice when

  • Avoid: long prompt text without clear acceptance criteria. Additional text length does not improve reviewability while the expected output and acceptance decision remain unclear.
  • There is neither safe test data nor a manual fallback.
  • A product demo is expected to replace domain acceptance.

Bound the reusable work module

The work assignment is to make instructions reproducible, testable and maintainable. Define purpose, owner and permitted operating boundary before the first test.

The domain review baseline covers goal, context, boundaries, examples, output format and evaluation. Assumptions and missing information remain visible in the result.

Develop instructions using examples

  • Describe the desired result and its acceptance criteria before writing the instructions themselves.
  • Add only required context and define boundaries and handling of missing information.
  • Test examples and a concrete output format against typical tasks and edge cases.
  • Version instructions and tests and revise unclear rules using observed failures.

Demonstrate repeatability

A fixed test set shows that typical tasks produce the agreed output and edge cases keep missing information visible. Instruction changes have a documented review result.

Avoid: long prompt text without clear acceptance criteria. Additional text length does not improve reviewability while the expected output and acceptance decision remain unclear.

Decision matrix

Decision pointProceed whenStop when
Assignment and inputsDocumented: goal, context, boundaries, examples, output format and evaluation.Scope, data or accountability remains unresolved.
RepeatabilityA fixed test set shows that typical tasks produce the agreed output and edge cases keep missing information visible. Instruction changes have a documented review result.There is only an unevaluated demo without acceptance evidence.
Maintenance and boundariesOwner, approval, fallback and next review date are defined.Avoid: long prompt text without clear acceptance criteria. Additional text length does not improve reviewability while the expected output and acceptance decision remain unclear.

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Which AI system fits your business?

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials