Case evidence / owned system

AI drafts. Professional accountability decides.

meineGBU is operated by lol.marketing LLC. This evidence describes architecture and controls; it makes no unverified time-saving or success claim.

WERKVERSTAND / CONNECTING INTELLIGENCE

The essential answer

The system structures inputs using GDA-oriented hazard factors, creates a reviewable draft and keeps professional approval and documentation visibly separate.

01 / FIT

A good fit when

  • a structured draft prepares professional work
  • method and output format are clearly defined
  • professional review is provided

02 / LIMITS

Not the first choice when

  • AI is expected to replace the employer's legal responsibility
  • automatic safety-expert approval is claimed
  • incomplete operational data is treated as safe

The evidenced process

The user describes the activity, work environment and existing controls. The system structures the information, checks completeness and prepares hazards, risks and measures in a fixed document structure.

Control boundaries

The AI draft is not automatic legal or professional approval. Accountability, operational plausibility, participation and effectiveness review remain with the responsible people. Optional safety-expert review is a separate step.

Why this qualifies as evidence

  • The system is developed and operated by the owner
  • Method and output structure are visible in the product
  • No unsupported client outcomes are attributed

Keep it verifiable

Primary sources

The next sensible step

Which AI system fits your business?

Eight steps from a general interest in AI to a clearer decision for your business.

Start AI System Check
FreeProvider-neutralNo credentials